Mazda 6 2018 vs Volvo V40 2016
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 194 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 258 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Mazda 6 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda 6 engine produces 72 HP more power than Volvo V40, whereas torque is 38 NM more than Volvo V40. Thanks to more power Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo V40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 6 consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 6 could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 6 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 1140 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 1400 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo V40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Mazda 6 is larger. Mazda 6 is 43 cm longer than the Volvo V40, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 6 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 522 litres | 335 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1664 litres | 1500 litres | |
|
Mazda 6 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 6 has 187 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V40. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 6 (by 164 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volvo V40. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`113 | 1`965 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Volvo V40 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 6 has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Volvo V40, so Volvo V40 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 22 000 | 13 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |