Mazda 6 2018 vs Mazda 6 2015

 
Mazda 6
2018 -
Mazda 6
2015 - 2018
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.5 Petrol2.5 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 194 HP192 HP
Torque: 258 NM256 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.9 seconds7.9 seconds
Mazda 6 2018 engine produces 2 HP more power than Mazda 6 2015, whereas torque is 2 NM more than Mazda 6 2015.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.86.4
Real fuel consumption: 8.2 l/100km8.0 l/100km
The Mazda 6 2015 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda 6 2018 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6 2015, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 6 2018 could require 60 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 6 2018 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6 2015.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 910 km in combined cycle960 km in combined cycle
1100 km on highway1210 km on highway
750 km with real consumption770 km with real consumption
Mazda 6 2015 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Ground clearance: 165 mm (6.5 inches)165 mm (6.5 inches)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 440'000 km440'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 11 years11 years

Dimensions

Length: 4.80 m4.80 m
Width: 1.84 m1.84 m
Height: 1.48 m1.48 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 6 2018 and Mazda 6 2015 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 522 litres522 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1664 litres1664 litres
Turning diameter: 11 meters11 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`1132`040
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

low
Average price (€): 22 00010 600
Pros and Cons:
    Mazda 6 has
    • lower fuel consumption
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv