Mazda 6 2018 vs Volvo V60 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 194 HP | 299 HP | |
| Torque: | 258 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 6 seconds | |
|
Volvo V60 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 6 engine produces 105 HP less power than Volvo V60, whereas torque is 162 NM less than Volvo V60. Due to the lower power, Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 7.0 | |
| Mazda 6 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | 142 mm (5.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 6 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 6 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.43 m | |
| Mazda 6 is 4 cm longer than the Volvo V60, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 6 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 522 litres | 529 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1664 litres | 1441 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 1.1 metres less than that of the Volvo V60, which means Mazda 6 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`113 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mazda 6 is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Volvo V60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 6 has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Volvo V60, so Volvo V60 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 17 200 | 22 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Volvo V60 has
| |