Mazda 6 2018 vs Skoda Superb 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 194 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 258 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
|
Skoda Superb is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 6 engine produces 6 HP less power than Skoda Superb, whereas torque is 22 NM less than Skoda Superb. Due to the lower power, Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 8.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 9.9 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 6 consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 6 consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.51 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 6 is 3 cm shorter than the Skoda Superb, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 6 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 522 litres | 633 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1664 litres | 1865 litres | |
|
Skoda Superb has more luggage space. Mazda 6 has 111 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Superb. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Superb (by 201 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Skoda Superb, which means Mazda 6 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`113 kg | 2`125 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`466 kg | 1`562 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 647 kg | 563 kg | |
| Mazda 6 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 13 procentiem more than Skoda Superb. Therefore, Mazda 6 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Mazda 6 is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Skoda Superb has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 6 has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Skoda Superb, so Skoda Superb quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 17 200 | 8600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Skoda Superb has
| |