Mazda 6 2018 vs Volvo V40 2016
Body: | Estate car / wagon | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 165 HP | 122 HP | |
Torque: | 213 NM | 220 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
Volvo V40 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 6 engine produces 43 HP more power than Volvo V40, but torque is 7 NM less than Volvo V40. Despite the higher power, Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 5.4 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
By specification Mazda 6 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 6 could require 135 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mazda 6 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 62 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 1140 km in combined cycle | |
1120 km on highway | 1400 km on highway | ||
810 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.80 m | 4.37 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.44 m | |
Mazda 6 is larger. Mazda 6 is 43 cm longer than the Volvo V40, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 6 is 4 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 522 litres | 335 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1664 litres | 1500 litres | |
Mazda 6 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 6 has 187 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V40. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 6 (by 164 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volvo V40. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`071 | 1`965 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | above average | |
Volvo V40 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 6 has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Volvo V40, so Volvo V40 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 22 000 | 13 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |