Mazda 6 2018 vs Skoda Superb 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 213 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
|
Skoda Superb is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 6 engine produces 35 HP less power than Skoda Superb, whereas torque is 67 NM less than Skoda Superb. Due to the lower power, Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 8.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 9.9 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 6 consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 6 consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 1120 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 820 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Mazda 6 2018 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda 6 2018 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.51 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 6 is 3 cm shorter than the Skoda Superb, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 6 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 522 litres | 603 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1664 litres | no data | |
|
Skoda Superb has more luggage space. Mazda 6 has 81 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Superb. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`071 | 2`125 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mazda 6 is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Skoda Superb has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 6 has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Skoda Superb, so Skoda Superb quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 19 000 | 17 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Skoda Superb has
| |