Mazda 6 2018 vs Skoda Octavia 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 HP | 230 HP | |
| Torque: | 213 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 7 seconds | |
|
Skoda Octavia is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 6 engine produces 65 HP less power than Skoda Octavia, whereas torque is 137 NM less than Skoda Octavia. Due to the lower power, Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 6 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 6 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 1120 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 820 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | 141 mm (5.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 6 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 6 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
| Mazda 6 2018 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda 6 2018 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Mazda 6 is larger. Mazda 6 is 11 cm longer than the Skoda Octavia, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 6 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 522 litres | 588 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1664 litres | 1740 litres | |
|
Skoda Octavia has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Mazda 6 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Octavia (by 76 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Skoda Octavia, which means Mazda 6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`071 kg | 1`953 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`435 kg | 1`387 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 636 kg | 566 kg | |
| Mazda 6 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 11 procentiem more than Skoda Octavia. Therefore, Mazda 6 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Skoda Octavia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 6 has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Skoda Octavia, so Skoda Octavia quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 17 800 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Skoda Octavia has
| |