Mazda 6 2018 vs Mazda 6 2015

 
Mazda 6
2018 -
Mazda 6
2015 - 2018
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 165 HP145 HP
Torque: 213 NM210 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.1 seconds9.6 seconds
Mazda 6 2018 is more dynamic to drive.
Mazda 6 2018 engine produces 20 HP more power than Mazda 6 2015, whereas torque is 3 NM more than Mazda 6 2015. Thanks to more power Mazda 6 2018 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.65.6
Real fuel consumption: 7.0 l/100km6.7 l/100km
The Mazda 6 2015 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda 6 2018 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6 2015, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 6 2018 could require 150 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 6 2018 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6 2015.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 930 km in combined cycle1100 km in combined cycle
1140 km on highway1310 km on highway
880 km with real consumption920 km with real consumption
Mazda 6 2015 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Ground clearance: 165 mm (6.5 inches)165 mm (6.5 inches)

Dimensions

Length: 4.80 m4.80 m
Width: 1.84 m1.84 m
Height: 1.48 m1.48 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 6 2018 and Mazda 6 2015 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 522 litres522 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1664 litres1664 litres
Turning diameter: 11 meters11 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`0421`980
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

low
Average price (€): 19 40010 600
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Mazda 6 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv