Mazda 6 2018 vs Volvo V60 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 145 HP | 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 213 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 6.7 seconds | |
|
Volvo V60 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 6 engine produces 104 HP less power than Volvo V60, whereas torque is 137 NM less than Volvo V60. Due to the lower power, Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 60 litres | |
| Ground clearance: | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | 142 mm (5.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 6 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 6 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.43 m | |
| Mazda 6 is 4 cm longer than the Volvo V60, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 6 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 522 litres | 529 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1664 litres | 1441 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Mazda 6 has 7 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V60. This could mean that the Mazda 6 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 6 (by 223 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volvo V60. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`980 | 2`220 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mazda 6 is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Volvo V60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 6 has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Volvo V60, so Volvo V60 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 22 000 | 29 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Volvo V60 has
| |