Mazda 6 2018 vs Mazda 6 2015

 
Mazda 6
2018 -
Mazda 6
2015 - 2018
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 145 HP145 HP
Torque: 213 NM210 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.6 seconds9.6 seconds
Mazda 6 2018 and Mazda 6 2015 have the same engine power, but Mazda 6 2018 torque is 3 NM more than Mazda 6 2015.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.35.6
Real fuel consumption: 7.4 l/100km6.7 l/100km
The Mazda 6 2015 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda 6 2018 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6 2015, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 6 2018 could require 105 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 6 2018 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6 2015.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 980 km in combined cycle1100 km in combined cycle
1140 km on highway1310 km on highway
830 km with real consumption920 km with real consumption
Mazda 6 2015 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Ground clearance: 165 mm (6.5 inches)165 mm (6.5 inches)

Dimensions

Length: 4.80 m4.80 m
Width: 1.84 m1.84 m
Height: 1.48 m1.48 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 6 2018 and Mazda 6 2015 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 522 litres522 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1664 litres1664 litres
Turning diameter: 11 meters11 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`0421`980
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

low
Average price (€): 22 00010 600
Pros and Cons:
    Mazda 6 has
    • lower fuel consumption
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv