Mazda 6 2018 vs Volvo V60 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 197 HP | |
| Torque: | 445 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
|
Volvo V60 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 6 engine produces 13 HP less power than Volvo V60, but torque is 25 NM more than Volvo V60. Due to the lower power, Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 6.2 | |
|
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 6 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1210 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | 142 mm (5.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 6 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 6 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.43 m | |
| Mazda 6 is 4 cm longer than the Volvo V60, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 6 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 522 litres | 519 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1664 litres | 1431 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 1.1 metres less than that of the Volvo V60, which means Mazda 6 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`237 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mazda 6 is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Volvo V60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 6 has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Volvo V60, so Volvo V60 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 17 200 | 22 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Volvo V60 has
| |