Mazda 6 2018 vs Mazda 6 2015

 
Mazda 6
2018 -
Mazda 6
2015 - 2018
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.2 Diesel2.2 Diesel

Performance

Power: 184 HP150 HP
Torque: 445 NM380 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.6 seconds9.2 seconds
Mazda 6 2018 is more dynamic to drive.
Mazda 6 2018 engine produces 34 HP more power than Mazda 6 2015, whereas torque is 65 NM more than Mazda 6 2015. Thanks to more power Mazda 6 2018 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.84.4
Real fuel consumption: 5.3 l/100km6.1 l/100km
The Mazda 6 2018 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise.
By specification Mazda 6 2018 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6 2015, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 6 2018 could require 60 litres more fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mazda 6 2018 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6 2015.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1290 km in combined cycle1400 km in combined cycle
1440 km on highway1630 km on highway
1160 km with real consumption1010 km with real consumption
Ground clearance: 165 mm (6.5 inches)165 mm (6.5 inches)

Dimensions

Length: 4.80 m4.80 m
Width: 1.84 m1.84 m
Height: 1.48 m1.48 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 6 2018 and Mazda 6 2015 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 522 litres522 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1664 litres1664 litres
Turning diameter: 11 meters11 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`2172`090
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

low
Average price (€): 22 00011 000
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Mazda 6 has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv