Mazda 6 2018 vs Volkswagen Passat 2019
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 190 HP | |
Torque: | 380 NM | 400 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
Volkswagen Passat is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 6 engine produces 40 HP less power than Volkswagen Passat, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Volkswagen Passat. Due to the lower power, Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.6 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 6 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 6 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.80 m | 4.77 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.83 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.52 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 6 is 3 cm longer than the Volkswagen Passat, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 6 is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 522 litres | 650 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1664 litres | no data | |
Volkswagen Passat has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda 6 has 128 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Passat. This could mean that the Mazda 6 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`189 | 2`190 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | below average | |
Average price (€): | 19 000 | 28 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Volkswagen Passat has
| |