Mazda 6 2018 vs Skoda Superb 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Mazda 6 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda 6 engine produces 10 HP more power than Skoda Superb, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Skoda Superb. Thanks to more power Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 6 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 6 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1370 km in combined cycle | 1300 km in combined cycle | |
| 1510 km on highway | 1500 km on highway | ||
| 1030 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 6 is 3 cm shorter than the Skoda Superb, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 6 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 522 litres | 603 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1664 litres | no data | |
|
Skoda Superb has more luggage space. Mazda 6 has 81 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Superb. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Skoda Superb, which means Mazda 6 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`189 | 2`117 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mazda 6 is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Skoda Superb has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 6 has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Skoda Superb, so Skoda Superb quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 19 000 | 17 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Skoda Superb has
| |