Mazda 6 2018 vs Skoda Superb 2019
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 445 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 9.1 seconds | |
|
Mazda 6 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda 6 engine produces 34 HP more power than Skoda Superb, whereas torque is 105 NM more than Skoda Superb. Thanks to more power Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 3.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.3 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mazda 6 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 6 could require 120 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mazda 6 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1310 km in combined cycle | 1690 km in combined cycle | |
| 1510 km on highway | 1830 km on highway | ||
| 1160 km with real consumption | 1170 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Superb gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | 147 mm (5.8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 6 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 6 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 6 is 3 cm longer than the Skoda Superb, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 6 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 481 litres | 625 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 2067 litres | |
|
Skoda Superb has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Mazda 6 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.9 metres more than that of the Skoda Superb, which means Mazda 6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`182 kg | 2`128 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 22 000 | 22 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Skoda Superb has
| |