Mazda 6 2018 vs Volvo S60 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 227 HP | 254 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.5 seconds | |
| Mazda 6 engine produces 27 HP less power than Volvo S60, but torque is 70 NM more than Volvo S60. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 7.2 | |
|
The Volvo S60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 6 consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 6 could require 270 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| Volvo S60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.43 m | |
| Mazda 6 is 13 cm longer than the Volvo S60, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 6 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 416 litres | 442 litres | |
|
Volvo S60 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda 6 has 26 litres less trunk space than the Volvo S60. This could mean that the Mazda 6 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mazda 6 is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Volvo S60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 6 has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Volvo S60, so Volvo S60 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 23 800 | 30 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Volvo S60 has
| |