Mazda 6 2018 vs Volvo S60 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 194 HP | 254 HP | |
| Torque: | 258 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 6.5 seconds | |
|
Volvo S60 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 6 engine produces 60 HP less power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 92 NM less than Volvo S60. Due to the lower power, Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 7.2 | |
|
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 6 consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 375 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1310 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | 142 mm (5.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 6 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 6 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.43 m | |
| Mazda 6 is 10 cm longer than the Volvo S60, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 6 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 489 litres | 442 litres | |
|
Mazda 6 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 6 has 47 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo S60. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`095 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mazda 6 is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Volvo S60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 6 has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Volvo S60, so Volvo S60 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 24 000 | 29 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Volvo S60 has
| |