Mazda 6 2018 vs Jaguar XF 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 194 HP | 340 HP | |
| Torque: | 258 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 5.4 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XF is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 6 engine produces 146 HP less power than Jaguar XF, whereas torque is 192 NM less than Jaguar XF. Due to the lower power, Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 8.6 | |
|
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 6 consumes 3.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XF, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 585 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 74 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1310 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 1510 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 3, Mazda CX-5 | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Jaguar XJ, Jaguar F-Type, Jaguar F-Pace, Jaguar XE | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Mazda 6 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.99 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Mazda 6 is smaller. Mazda 6 is 9 cm shorter than the Jaguar XF, 15 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 489 litres | 540 litres | |
|
Jaguar XF has more luggage space. Mazda 6 has 51 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar XF. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Jaguar XF, which means Mazda 6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`095 | 2`370 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mazda 6 is better rated in child safety tests. The Jaguar XF scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 22 000 | 18 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Jaguar XF has
| |