Mazda 6 2018 vs Toyota Camry 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 HP | 181 HP | |
| Torque: | 213 NM | 231 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Toyota Camry is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 6 engine produces 16 HP less power than Toyota Camry, whereas torque is 18 NM less than Toyota Camry. Due to the lower power, Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 8.3 | |
|
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 6 consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Camry, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 315 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | 127 mm (5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 6 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 6 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 3, Mazda MX-5, Mazda CX-5, Mazda CX-3 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota RAV4, Lexus ES | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Mazda 6 2018 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda 6 2018 2.0 engine Toyota Camry 2017 2.5 engine: The 2.5-liter 2AR-FE engine replaced the earlier 2.4-liter AZ series and is widely regarded as a highly reliable, long-lasting engine, often referred to as a "million-kms" motor. However, it requires ... More about Toyota Camry 2017 2.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.89 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 6 is 2 cm shorter than the Toyota Camry, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 489 litres | 493 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Toyota Camry, which means Mazda 6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`046 kg | 2`030 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`423 kg | 1`555 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 623 kg | 475 kg | |
| Mazda 6 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 24 procentiem more than Toyota Camry. Therefore, Mazda 6 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 800 | 21 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Toyota Camry has
| |