Mazda 6 2018 vs Ford Mondeo 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 213 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 9.1 seconds | |
|
Ford Mondeo is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 6 engine produces 5 HP more power than Ford Mondeo, but torque is 27 NM less than Ford Mondeo. Despite the higher power, Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 6.3 | |
| Mazda 6 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | 128 mm (5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 6 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 6 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
| Mazda 6 2018 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda 6 2018 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 6 and Ford Mondeo are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 489 litres | 429 litres | |
|
Mazda 6 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 6 has 60 litres more trunk space than the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Ford Mondeo, which means Mazda 6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`046 kg | 2`170 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`423 kg | 1`504 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 623 kg | 666 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mazda 6 scores higher in safety tests, but Ford Mondeo is better rated in child safety tests. The Mazda 6 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Mazda 6 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Mondeo has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Mazda 6, so Mazda 6 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 22 000 | 7600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |