Mazda 6 2018 vs Audi A4 2019
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Hybrid | |
| Petrol engines (Mazda 6) are generally cheaper to purchase and maintain, with simpler mechanics and consistent highway performance. Hybrid (Audi A4) engines, on the other hand, provide significantly better fuel efficiency and lower emissions, especially in urban and stop-and-go traffic conditions. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 HP | 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 213 NM | 370 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 5.8 seconds | |
|
Audi A4 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 6 engine produces 80 HP less power than Audi A4, whereas torque is 157 NM less than Audi A4. Due to the lower power, Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | 12.90 $ | no data | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Petrol$/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 54 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 790 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mazda 6 2018 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda 6 2018 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.43 m | |
| Mazda 6 is 10 cm longer than the Audi A4, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 6 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 489 litres | 460 litres | |
|
Mazda 6 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 6 has 29 litres more trunk space than the Audi A4. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Audi A4, which means Mazda 6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`046 kg | 2`110 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`423 kg | 1`545 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 623 kg | 565 kg | |
| Mazda 6 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 9 procentiem more than Audi A4. Therefore, Mazda 6 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Audi A4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 6 has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Audi A4, so Audi A4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 22 000 | 25 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Audi A4 has
| |