Mazda 6 2018 vs Volkswagen Passat 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 HP | 272 HP | |
| Torque: | 213 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 5.6 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Passat is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 6 engine produces 107 HP less power than Volkswagen Passat, whereas torque is 137 NM less than Volkswagen Passat. Due to the lower power, Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 7.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 10.2 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 6 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 6 consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1110 km on highway | ||
| 790 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | 145 mm (5.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 6 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 6 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
| Mazda 6 2018 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda 6 2018 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Mazda 6 is larger, but slightly lower. Mazda 6 is 9 cm longer than the Volkswagen Passat, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 6 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 489 litres | 586 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1152 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Passat has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Mazda 6 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Passat. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`046 kg | 2`200 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`423 kg | 1`570 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 623 kg | 630 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 22 000 | 22 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Volkswagen Passat has
| |