Mazda 6 2018 vs Skoda Superb 2019

 
Mazda 6
2018 -
Skoda Superb
2019 - 2023
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol1.5 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming belt
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating.

Performance

Power: 165 HP150 HP
Torque: 213 NM250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.1 seconds9.2 seconds
Skoda Superb is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda 6 engine produces 15 HP more power than Skoda Superb, but torque is 37 NM less than Skoda Superb. Despite the higher power, Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.25.4
Real fuel consumption: 7.8 l/100km7.1 l/100km
The Skoda Superb is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda 6 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 6 could require 120 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 6 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres66 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1000 km in combined cycle1220 km in combined cycle
1140 km on highway1430 km on highway
790 km with real consumption920 km with real consumption
Skoda Superb gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Ground clearance: 165 mm (6.5 inches)150 mm (5.9 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 6 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 6 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km330'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda 6 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 14 years9 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 3, Mazda MX-5, Mazda CX-5, Mazda CX-3Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Skoda Octavia, Audi A3, Skoda Scala, Audi A1, Audi Q3
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.
Mazda 6 2018 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ...  More about Mazda 6 2018 2.0 engine 

Skoda Superb 2019 1.5 engine: The engine is praised for being both flexible and torquey, delivering impressive performance for its horsepower rating. It is also remarkably fuel-efficient. However, the engine is very demanding when it comes ...  More about Skoda Superb 2019 1.5 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.87 m4.87 m
Width: 1.84 m1.86 m
Height: 1.45 m1.47 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 6 and Skoda Superb are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 489 litres625 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
no data1760 litres
Skoda Superb has more luggage space.
Mazda 6 has 136 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Superb.
Turning diameter: 12 meters11.1 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.9 metres more than that of the Skoda Superb, which means Mazda 6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: 2`046 kg2`043 kg
Net weight:1`423 kg1`395 kg
Load capacity:623 kg648 kg
Safety: no data
Quality:
low
no data
Average price (€): 22 00022 000
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • higher ground clearance
  • longer expected engine lifespan
Skoda Superb has
  • timing belt engine
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv