Mazda 6 2018 vs Volvo S90 2020
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 445 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
|
Volvo S90 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 6 engine produces 6 HP less power than Volvo S90, but torque is 45 NM more than Volvo S90. Due to the lower power, Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 55 litres | |
| Ground clearance: | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | 156 mm (6.1 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Mazda 6 is smaller, but slightly higher. Mazda 6 is 10 cm shorter than the Volvo S90, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 6 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 489 litres | 461 litres | |
|
Mazda 6 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mazda 6 has 28 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S90. The Volvo S90 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 250 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 238 metres less than that of the Volvo S90, which means Mazda 6 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`200 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 24 800 | 41 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Volvo S90 has
| |