Mazda 6 2018 vs Skoda Superb 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Mazda 6) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Skoda Superb) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 152 HP | |
| Torque: | 445 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
| Mazda 6 engine produces 32 HP more power than Skoda Superb, whereas torque is 195 NM more than Skoda Superb. Despite the higher power, Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 7.1 | |
|
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 6 consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1210 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 1370 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 6 is 3 cm longer than the Skoda Superb, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 6 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 489 litres | 595 litres | |
|
Skoda Superb has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda 6 has 106 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Superb. This could mean that the Mazda 6 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Skoda Superb, which means Mazda 6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`200 | 2`071 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mazda 6 is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Skoda Superb has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 6 has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Skoda Superb, so Skoda Superb quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 21 600 | 16 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Skoda Superb has
| |
