Mazda 6 2018 vs Skoda Superb 2019
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 seconds | 9.1 seconds | |
| Mazda 6 and Skoda Superb have the same engine power, but Mazda 6 torque is 40 NM more than Skoda Superb. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 3.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Superb is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 6 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 6 could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 6 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1400 km in combined cycle | 1690 km in combined cycle | |
| 1550 km on highway | 1830 km on highway | ||
| 1030 km with real consumption | 1170 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Superb gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | 147 mm (5.8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 6 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 6 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 6 and Skoda Superb are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 489 litres | 625 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 2067 litres | |
|
Skoda Superb has more luggage space. Mazda 6 has 136 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Superb. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.9 metres more than that of the Skoda Superb, which means Mazda 6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`005 kg | 2`128 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`534 kg | 1`480 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 471 kg | 648 kg | |
| Mazda 6 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 38 procentiem less than Skoda Superb. Therefore, Skoda Superb is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 200 | 21 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Skoda Superb has
| |