Mazda 6 2015 vs Volvo S80 2009
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 175 HP | |
Torque: | 380 NM | 420 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
Volvo S80 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 6 engine produces 25 HP less power than Volvo S80, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Volvo S80. Due to the lower power, Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 6.6 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 6 consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 6 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1290 km in combined cycle | 1060 km in combined cycle | |
1470 km on highway | 1370 km on highway | ||
890 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
Ground clearance: | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | 148 mm (5.8 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 6 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 6 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.87 m | 4.85 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.89 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.49 m | |
Mazda 6 is 2 cm longer than the Volvo S80, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 6 is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 481 litres | 480 litres | |
Mazda 6 has 1 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S80. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volvo S80, which means Mazda 6 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`070 | 2`200 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 17 000 | 5600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Volvo S80 has
| |