Mazda 6 2015 vs Mazda 3 2013

 
Mazda 6
2015 - 2018
Mazda 3
2013 - 2016
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.2 Diesel1.6 Petrol
Diesel (Mazda 6) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Mazda 3) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences."

Performance

Power: 150 HP104 HP
Torque: 380 NM144 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.8 seconds13.5 seconds
Mazda 6 is more dynamic to drive.
Mazda 6 engine produces 46 HP more power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 236 NM more than Mazda 3. Thanks to more power Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.86.3
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda 6 consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres51 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1290 km in combined cycle800 km in combined cycle
1470 km on highway1040 km on highway
Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Ground clearance: 165 mm (6.5 inches)155 mm (6.1 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 6 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 6 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions.

Dimensions

Length: 4.87 m4.59 m
Width: 1.84 m1.80 m
Height: 1.45 m1.45 m
Mazda 6 is larger.
Mazda 6 is 29 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 5 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 481 litres408 litres
Mazda 6 has more luggage capacity.
Mazda 6 has 73 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3.
Turning diameter: 11.2 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Mazda 6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0701`775
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

average
Mazda 3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 6 has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Mazda 3, so Mazda 3 quality is probably better
Average price (€): 16 60011 600
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher ground clearance
  • roomier boot
Mazda 3 has
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv