Mazda 6 2015 vs Volvo V90 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 192 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 256 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Mazda 6 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda 6 engine produces 2 HP more power than Volvo V90, but torque is 44 NM less than Volvo V90. Thanks to more power Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 6 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V90, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 6 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V90. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 1210 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 770 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | 153 mm (6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 6 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 6 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from two 4x4 versions of Mazda 6 2015 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.94 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Mazda 6 is smaller, but slightly higher. Mazda 6 is 14 cm shorter than the Volvo V90, 5 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 522 litres | 560 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1664 litres | 1526 litres | |
| Mazda 6 has 38 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V90. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 6 (by 138 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volvo V90, which means Mazda 6 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`040 | 2`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7800 | 19 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Volvo V90 has
| |