Mazda 6 2015 vs Volvo V50 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 175 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Volvo V50 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 6 engine produces 5 HP less power than Volvo V50, but torque is 70 NM more than Volvo V50. Due to the lower power, Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 7.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mazda 6 consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mazda 6 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1140 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 820 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Mazda 6 is larger. Mazda 6 is 28 cm longer than the Volvo V50, 7 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 6 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 522 litres | 417 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1664 litres | no data | |
|
Mazda 6 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 6 has 105 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V50. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo V50. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`150 | 2`020 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | Mazda 6 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo V50 has serious deffects in 175 percent more cases than Mazda 6, so Mazda 6 quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 10 600 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Volvo V50 has
| |