Mazda 6 2015 vs Volvo V70 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 175 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Mazda 6 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda 6 engine produces 12 HP more power than Volvo V70, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Volvo V70. Thanks to more power Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 4.9 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1260 km in combined cycle | 1420 km in combined cycle | |
| 1470 km on highway | 1620 km on highway | ||
| 910 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo V70 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | 151 mm (5.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 6 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 6 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from two 4x4 versions of Mazda 6 2015 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Mazda 6 is smaller. Mazda 6 is 1 cm shorter than the Volvo V70, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 6 is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 522 litres | 575 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1664 litres | 1580 litres | |
| Mazda 6 has 53 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V70. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 6 (by 84 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volvo V70. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`110 | 2`310 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Volvo V70 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mazda 6, so Volvo V70 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Volvo V70 has
| |