Mazda 6 2015 vs Renault Laguna 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 175 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Mazda 6 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda 6 and Renault Laguna have the same engine power, but Mazda 6 torque is 60 NM more than Renault Laguna. Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 6 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Laguna, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 6 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Laguna. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1260 km in combined cycle | 1190 km in combined cycle | |
| 1470 km on highway | 1410 km on highway | ||
| 910 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mazda CX-5 | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Laguna might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Laguna 2013 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 6 and Renault Laguna are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 522 litres | 508 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1664 litres | no data | |
| Mazda 6 has 14 litres more trunk space than the Renault Laguna. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Renault Laguna. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`110 | 2`107 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Mazda 6 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Laguna has serious deffects in 155 percent more cases than Mazda 6, so Mazda 6 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Renault Laguna has
| |