Mazda 6 2015 vs Skoda Superb 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 175 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Mazda 6 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda 6 engine produces 35 HP more power than Skoda Superb, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Skoda Superb. Thanks to more power Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 4.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Superb is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 6 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 6 could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 6 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1260 km in combined cycle | 1300 km in combined cycle | |
| 1470 km on highway | 1500 km on highway | ||
| 910 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 6 is 3 cm shorter than the Skoda Superb, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 6 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 522 litres | 603 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1664 litres | no data | |
|
Skoda Superb has more luggage space. Mazda 6 has 81 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Superb. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Skoda Superb, which means Mazda 6 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`110 | 2`117 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Skoda Superb has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 6 has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Skoda Superb, so Skoda Superb quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 16 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Skoda Superb has
| |