Mazda 6 2015 vs Subaru Outback 2013

 
Mazda 6
2015 - 2018
Subaru Outback
2013 - 2014
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 2.2 Diesel2.0 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 175 HP150 HP
Torque: 420 NM350 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.6 seconds9.7 seconds
Mazda 6 is more dynamic to drive.
Mazda 6 engine produces 25 HP more power than Subaru Outback, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Subaru Outback. Thanks to more power Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.96.3
Real fuel consumption: 6.3 l/100km7.1 l/100km
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda 6 consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Outback, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 6 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Outback.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres64 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1260 km in combined cycle1010 km in combined cycle
1470 km on highway1140 km on highway
980 km with real consumption900 km with real consumption
Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 350'000 km350'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 11 years16 years
Engine spread: Used also on Mazda CX-5Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Subaru Forester, Subaru Legacy
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Subaru Outback might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Mazda 6 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.80 m4.79 m
Width: 1.84 m1.82 m
Height: 1.48 m1.61 m
Mazda 6 is larger, but lower.
Mazda 6 is 1 cm longer than the Subaru Outback, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 6 is 13 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 522 litres526 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1664 litresno data
Mazda 6 has 4 litres less trunk space than the Subaru Outback.
Turning diameter: 11 meters11 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`1102`100
Safety: no data
Quality:
average
no data
Average price (€): 10 60017 800
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Subaru Outback has
  • has 4x4 drive
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv