Mazda 6 2015 vs Volvo V90 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Mazda 6 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda 6 and Volvo V90 have the same engine power, but Mazda 6 torque is 60 NM more than Volvo V90. Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo V90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 6 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V90, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 6 could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 6 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V90. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1260 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| 1470 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| 920 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | 153 mm (6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 6 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 6 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from two 4x4 versions of Mazda 6 2015 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.94 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Mazda 6 is smaller, but slightly higher. Mazda 6 is 14 cm shorter than the Volvo V90, 5 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 522 litres | 560 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1664 litres | 1526 litres | |
| Mazda 6 has 38 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V90. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 6 (by 138 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volvo V90, which means Mazda 6 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`110 | 2`270 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7800 | 19 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Volvo V90 has
| |