Mazda 6 2015 vs Volvo V50 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 8 seconds | |
|
Volvo V50 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 6 engine produces 30 HP less power than Volvo V50, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Volvo V50. Due to the lower power, Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 6 consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 6 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1400 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
| 1630 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
| 1010 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.46 m | |
| Mazda 6 is 28 cm longer than the Volvo V50, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 6 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 522 litres | 417 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1664 litres | no data | |
|
Mazda 6 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 6 has 105 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V50. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo V50. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`090 | 2`020 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | Mazda 6 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo V50 has serious deffects in 210 percent more cases than Mazda 6, so Mazda 6 quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 7800 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Volvo V50 has
| |