Mazda 6 2015 vs Volvo V90 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Volvo V90 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 6 engine produces 25 HP less power than Volvo V90, whereas torque is 90 NM less than Volvo V90. Due to the lower power, Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 6 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V90, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 6 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V90. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 1240 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 810 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | 153 mm (6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 6 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 6 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from two 4x4 versions of Mazda 6 2015 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
| Mazda 6 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda 6 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.94 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Mazda 6 is smaller, but slightly higher. Mazda 6 is 14 cm shorter than the Volvo V90, 5 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 522 litres | 560 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1664 litres | 1526 litres | |
| Mazda 6 has 38 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V90. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 6 (by 138 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volvo V90, which means Mazda 6 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`020 | 2`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7800 | 19 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Volvo V90 has
| |