Mazda 6 2002 vs Honda Accord 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.3 | 2.0 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 - 166 HP | 140 - 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 165 - 310 NM | 190 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 - 11.1 seconds | 7.9 - 10.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 - 8.9 | 5.4 - 9.4 | |
|
Mazda 6 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda Accord. On average, Mazda 6 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Accord. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 6 is 1 cm longer than the Honda Accord, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 459 litres | |
|
Mazda 6 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 6 has 41 litres more trunk space than the Honda Accord. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Honda Accord, which means Mazda 6 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`878 | ~ 1`920 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 2000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.3/10 | 8.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Honda Accord has
| |