Mazda 6 2005 vs BMW 3 series 2001

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda 6
2005 - 2007
BMW 3 series
2001 - 2005
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Mazda 6 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while BMW 3 series can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Mazda 6 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs.
Engines: 1.8 - 2.31.8 - 3.0

Performance

Power: 120 - 260 HP105 - 231 HP
Torque: 165 - 380 NM165 - 410 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.6 - 10.7 seconds6.5 - 14 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.0 - 10.25.5 - 11.0
Mazda 6 petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than BMW 3 series. On average, Mazda 6 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.70 m4.47 m
Width: 1.78 m1.74 m
Height: 1.44 m1.42 m
Mazda 6 is larger.
Mazda 6 is 23 cm longer than the BMW 3 series, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 6 is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 501 litres440 litres
Mazda 6 has more luggage capacity.
Mazda 6 has 61 litres more trunk space than the BMW 3 series.
Turning diameter: 11.9 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 1.9 metres more than that of the BMW 3 series, which means Mazda 6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`934~ 1`964
Safety:
Quality:
above average

below average
Average price (€): 12002400
Rating in user reviews: 7.7/10 7.9/10
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • also available in 2WD
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
BMW 3 sērija has
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv