Mazda 6 2007 vs BMW 3 series 2005

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda 6
2007 - 2010
BMW 3 series
2005 - 2008
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Mazda 6 is available only with front wheel drive, while BMW 3 series can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines: 1.8 - 3.71.6 - 3.0

Performance

Power: 120 - 272 HP122 - 306 HP
Torque: 165 - 400 NM160 - 580 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8 - 11.3 seconds5.5 - 11 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.6 - 11.04.7 - 10.0
Mazda 6 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than BMW 3 series. On average, Mazda 6 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.78 m4.52 m
Width: 1.81 m1.82 m
Height: 1.44 m1.42 m
Mazda 6 is 26 cm longer than the BMW 3 series, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 6 is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 519 litres460 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1385 litres
Mazda 6 has more luggage capacity.
Mazda 6 has 59 litres more trunk space than the BMW 3 series.
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.4 metres more than that of the BMW 3 series, which means Mazda 6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`965~ 2`007
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

average
Average price (€): 28004600
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
BMW 3 sērija has
  • available with 4x4 drive
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv