Mazda 6 2012 vs Mazda 6 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 192 HP | 150 - 192 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 - 420 NM | 210 - 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 - 10.6 seconds | 7.8 - 10.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.9 - 6.3 | 3.9 - 6.5 | |
|
Mazda 6 2012 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 6 2015. On average, a Mazda 6 2012 with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Mazda 6 2015. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 6 2012 and Mazda 6 2015 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 489 litres | 481 litres | |
| Mazda 6 2012 has 8 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 6 2015. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 2012 is 1 metres less than that of the Mazda 6 2015, which means Mazda 6 2012 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`009 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 17 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
| |