Mazda 6 2015 vs Mazda 6 2012

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda 6
2015 - 2018
Mazda 6
2012 - 2015
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 2.0 - 2.52.0 - 2.5

Performance

Power: 150 - 192 HP150 - 192 HP
Torque: 210 - 420 NM210 - 420 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.8 - 10.5 seconds7.8 - 10.6 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 3.9 - 6.53.9 - 6.3
Mazda 6 2015 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 6 2012. On average, a Mazda 6 2015 with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Mazda 6 2012.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.87 m4.87 m
Width: 1.84 m1.84 m
Height: 1.45 m1.45 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 6 2015 and Mazda 6 2012 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 481 litres489 litres
Mazda 6 2015 has 8 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 6 2012.
Turning diameter: 11.2 meters10.2 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 2015 is 1 metres more than that of the Mazda 6 2012, which means Mazda 6 2015 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`009no data
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 17 8006600
Pros and Cons:
    Mazda 6 has
    • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
    • better manoeuvrability
    • fewer faults
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv