Mazda 6 2015 vs Audi A3 2008

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda 6
2015 - 2018
Audi A3
2008 - 2013
Body: SedanHatchback
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Mazda 6 is available only with front wheel drive, while Audi A3 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines: 2.0 - 2.51.2 - 3.2

Performance

Power: 150 - 192 HP90 - 250 HP
Torque: 210 - 420 NM148 - 350 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.8 - 10.5 seconds6.2 - 13.3 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 3.9 - 6.54.2 - 9.4
Mazda 6 petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Audi A3. On average, Mazda 6 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Ground clearance: 165 mm (6.5 inches)110 mm (4.3 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 6 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Dimensions

Length: 4.87 m4.29 m
Width: 1.84 m1.76 m
Height: 1.45 m1.42 m
Mazda 6 is larger.
Mazda 6 is 58 cm longer than the Audi A3, 8 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 6 is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 481 litres370 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1120 litres
Mazda 6 has more luggage capacity.
Mazda 6 has 111 litres more trunk space than the Audi A3.
Turning diameter: 11.2 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Audi A3, which means Mazda 6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`009~ 1`916
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

high
Average price (€): 17 8006400
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • higher ground clearance
  • roomier boot
Audi A3 has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv