Mazda 6 2015 vs Mazda 3 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 1.5 - 2.2 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 - 192 HP | 104 - 165 HP | |
Torque: | 210 - 420 NM | 144 - 380 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 - 10.5 seconds | 8 - 13.5 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.9 - 6.5 | 3.8 - 6.3 | |
Mazda 6 petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. On average, Mazda 6 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Ground clearance: | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 6 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.87 m | 4.59 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.45 m | |
Mazda 6 is larger. Mazda 6 is 29 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 5 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 481 litres | 419 litres | |
Mazda 6 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 6 has 62 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Mazda 6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`009 | ~ 1`846 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 17 000 | 11 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |