Mazda 6 2002 vs Mazda 626 1999

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda 6
2002 - 2005
Mazda 626
1999 - 2002
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Mazda 6 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mazda 626 can be equipped only with front wheel drive.
Engines: 1.8 - 2.31.8 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 120 - 166 HP100 - 136 HP
Torque: 165 - 310 NM152 - 230 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.2 - 12.3 seconds10.5 - 12.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.4 - 10.56.3 - 9.1
Mazda 6 petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 626. On average, Mazda 6 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.69 m4.68 m
Width: 1.78 m1.71 m
Height: 1.45 m1.52 m
Mazda 6 is larger, but lower.
Mazda 6 is 1 cm longer than the Mazda 626, 7 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 6 is 7 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 505 litres540 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1712 litres1677 litres
Despite its longer length, Mazda 6 has 35 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 626. This could mean that the Mazda 6 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 6 (by 35 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters10.8 meters
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`959~ 1`866
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

above average
Average price (€): 1000600
Rating in user reviews: 6.3/10 6.2/10
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • available with 4x4 drive
Mazda 626 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv