Mazda 6 2002 vs Volvo V50 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.3 | 1.6 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 - 166 HP | 100 - 220 HP | |
| Torque: | 165 - 310 NM | 150 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 - 12.3 seconds | 6.9 - 12.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 - 10.5 | 5.0 - 10.2 | |
|
Mazda 6 petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo V50. On average, Mazda 6 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Mazda 6 is larger. Mazda 6 is 18 cm longer than the Volvo V50, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | 417 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1712 litres | 1307 litres | |
|
Mazda 6 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 6 has 88 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V50. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 6 (by 405 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volvo V50. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`959 | ~ 1`856 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.3/10 | 6.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Volvo V50 has
| |