Mazda 6 2010 vs Mazda 6 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.5 | 1.8 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 - 180 HP | 120 - 185 HP | |
| Torque: | 165 - 400 NM | 165 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 - 11.8 seconds | 8.3 - 11.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 8.1 | 5.6 - 8.2 | |
|
Mazda 6 2010 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 6 2008. On average, Mazda 6 2010 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6 2008. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.44 m | |
| Mazda 6 2010 is 8 cm longer than the Mazda 6 2008, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 6 2010 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 519 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1751 litres | 1751 litres | |
| Mazda 6 2010 has 14 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 6 2008. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 2010 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda 6 2008, which means Mazda 6 2010 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`061 | ~ 2`051 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |