Mazda 6 2010 vs Honda Accord 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.5 | 2.0 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 - 180 HP | 150 - 201 HP | |
| Torque: | 165 - 400 NM | 192 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 - 11.8 seconds | 8.3 - 10.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 8.1 | 5.5 - 8.7 | |
|
Mazda 6 petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Honda Accord. On average, Mazda 6 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Accord. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.47 m | |
| Mazda 6 is 4 cm longer than the Honda Accord, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 6 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 519 litres | 406 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1751 litres | 1183 litres | |
|
Mazda 6 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 6 has 113 litres more trunk space than the Honda Accord. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 6 (by 568 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Honda Accord. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`061 | ~ 2`078 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
| |