Mazda 6 2010 vs Ford Focus 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.8 - 2.5 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 120 - 180 HP | 95 - 250 HP | |
Torque: | 165 - 400 NM | 150 - 360 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 - 11.8 seconds | 6.5 - 12.7 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 8.1 | 4.5 - 7.2 | |
Mazda 6 petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Focus. On average, Mazda 6 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Focus. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.79 m | 4.56 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.49 m | 1.51 m | |
Mazda 6 is 23 cm longer than the Ford Focus, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 6 is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 519 litres | 490 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1751 litres | 1516 litres | |
Mazda 6 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 6 has 29 litres more trunk space than the Ford Focus. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 6 (by 235 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Ford Focus. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`061 | ~ 1`954 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | average | |
Average price (€): | 4200 | 4200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Ford Focus has
| |