Mazda 6 2010 vs Audi A4 2008

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda 6
2010 - 2012
Audi A4
2008 - 2011
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Mazda 6 is available only with front wheel drive, while Audi A4 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines: 1.8 - 2.51.8 - 3.2

Performance

Power: 120 - 180 HP120 - 265 HP
Torque: 165 - 400 NM250 - 500 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.4 - 11.8 seconds6.3 - 11.2 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.2 - 8.15.3 - 9.2
Mazda 6 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Audi A4. On average, Mazda 6 equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A4.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.79 m4.70 m
Width: 1.80 m1.83 m
Height: 1.49 m1.44 m
Mazda 6 is 9 cm longer than the Audi A4, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 6 is 5 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 519 litres490 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1751 litresno data
Mazda 6 has more luggage capacity.
Mazda 6 has 29 litres more trunk space than the Audi A4.
Turning diameter: 11.8 meters11.4 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Audi A4, which means Mazda 6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`061~ 2`151
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

high
Average price (€): 42006200
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Audi A4 has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv